ARTICLE 14 & 15, CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
ARTICLE 14 & 15
CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA
(With respect to
Human Rights)
ABHIRA
SHUKLA
B.Sc., LL.B
DR.
BHIM RAO AMBEDKAR UNIVERSITY, AGRA
v ARTICLE 14 & 15 IN INDIA:
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution is the stepping stone which clearly states that India is a democratic, secular, republic nation whose primary duty is to protect the interest of the people of its country. To protect its interest of his, it has given some rights i.e. fundamental rights to its citizens. These rights are for the upliftment of those sections in the society who are the poorest of the poor, neglected and oppressed. These fundamental rights in the constitution were taken from different sources like England’s bill of rights, France’s declaration of rights of man and the US bill of rights
Talking
about the fundamental rights, there are six fundamental rights which have been
given to the citizens of India whereas Article 14 is also given to any person
i.e. Non-Indian. Here we will discuss articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of
India. Article 14 interpret as “Equality before the law” and “Equal protection
of laws”. Article 15 regarding “Non-discrimination” on certain grounds like,
Race, Religion, Caste, Sex and Place of birth. So here we can say
discrimination is contrary to the principles of equality.
v OVERVIEW
OF ARTICLE 14:
Article
14 of constitution states, “The State shall not deny to any person equality
before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of
India, Prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of race, religion, caste,
sex or place of birth”
According
to Professor Jennings, “Equality before the law means that
among equals the law should be equal and should be equally administered that
like should be treated alike”
· The
word ‘any person’ in article 14 includes any company or association or body of
an individual, non-citizen to natural person as well as legal persons.
· In
India, there is a ‘Rule of Law’ which was perfectly explained by Dicey which
was described under three meanings of rule of law as follows
1. Absence
of Arbitrary power or supremacy of law.
2. Equality
before the law.
3. The
constitution is the result of the ordinary law of the land
In
case of State of West Bengal vs. Anwar Ali Sarkar, the question put forward
that if the right to equality is absolute right or not
In
this landmark case the SC held that the right to equality is not an absolute
right. In this case, the State of Bengal was found to use its power arbitrarily
to refer any case to the special court which was made by them so, the act of
State of Bengal infringement the right to equality.
v OVERVIEW
OF ARTICLE 15:
Abundant
cases of discrimination which are based on a different variables can be seen. The
majority of them consist of caste and religion. On the other hand in
patriarchal society, we have encountered gender discrimination from the
beginning, which includes women as well as LGBTQA+ individuals. However,
decriminalisation of section 377 of IPC is the initiative to give recognition
to the LGBTQA+ community.
· ARTICLE
15(1) of the Indian Constitution, 1949 states that “there
should be no discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex and
place of birth.
In the landmark case D.P.
Joshi vs. State of Madhya Bharat (1955), it was held that it was valid
as a rule of the state medical college whereby the Non-Madhya Bharat students
required a withholding fee for admission to the college, in this case it was
held that it does not violate Article 15(1) on the ground of residence
· ARTICLE
15(2) states that an individual shall not be subjected to
restriction, any disability or any other form of discrimination concerning to
his/her religion. It was invoked in Nainsukhdas vs. State of U.P
· ARTICLE
15(3), under this clause the state may not prevent itself
from making any provision or special provision concerning to women and
children. Recently, in the case of Joseph Shine vs. Union of India, Adultery
was decriminalised and it can only be used as a basis for divorce
· ARTICLE
15(4), this provision added by the first amendment to the
constitution which gives the state the authority to establish a specific
arrangements for (i) Backward classes of citizens (ii) Schedule Class (iii)
Schedule Tribe. In the historic case State of Madras vs. C. Dorairajan
·
ARTICLE 15(5) was
inserted by the 93rd Amendment Act, 2005. It states that the state
should make provision for reservation of socially and educationally backward
classes of citizen. In the landmark case of Ashok Kumar Thakur vs. Union of
India (2008)
·
ARTICLE 15(6), this
clause is inserted in 2019 by the 103rd Amendment, where the
government authority has to establish specific provision for betterment and
uplifting “economically weaker groups” of society i.e. 10% reservation must be
set aside for EWs.
By looking at all the
provisions provided under these clauses we can say that these act as a shield
against discrimination which protects the oppressed and neglected.
v HUMAN
RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO ARTICLE 14 &15:
Human
rights are the primary rights which are given to any person by birth
irrespective of their nationality, religion, language, sex, etc.
Human
rights can be defined under the “Protection of Human Rights Act”, as “any
rights relating to life, liberty, equality and dignity of individual guaranteed
by the constitution or embodied in the International Covenants and
enforceable by courts in India”
While
drafting the constitution of India, the framers covered the rights provided in
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in our constitution either in
fundamental rights or Directive Principle of State Policy.
·
International Human Rights and
Article 14:
On January 01/1942, India
signed the Universal Declaration on Human Rights
· International
Covenant on Political and Civil Righ,1966 (ICCPR) AND Article 14 & 15:
Articles 14 and 15 are
similar to the civil and political rights contained in ICCPR, 1966. Justice
V.R. Krishna Iyer observed that though a provision is present in ICCPR but not
in Indian Constitution does not make the covenant an enforceable part of
‘Corpus Juris’ in India in the case of Jolly George Varghese & Anr vs.
Bank of Cochin.
Article 14 is similar to
article 14(1) of ICCPR which stated “All persons shall be equal before the
courts and tribunals”.
Article 15 and 14 of the
constitution is similar to Article 26 of ICCPR which emphasises on equality and
equal protection before the law and no discrimination based on race, colour,
sex, language, religion, etc.
v Citizenship
Amendment Act and violation of Article 14:
Citizenship
Amendment Act, 2019 brought to grant Indian citizenship to illegal immigrants
from six minority groups from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh who arrived
prior to December 2014 in fear of religious ‘persecution’. However, it removes
Muslims from the list of these countries who are persecuted for their faith.
CAA violates Article 14 as well as the concept of Secularism which directly
breaches the notion of ‘Basic structure doctrine’ in the constitution.
v CONCLUSION:
The
Constitution of India lays down the foundation to protect the rights of its
citizen which on occasion includes natural or human rights under the sect of
fundamental rights. These fundamental rights allow an individual to live with
dignity and promote the idea of a secular state. As we can see under article
15, breaking the wall of discrimination to treat everyone on the same parameter
with just and equity. Sometimes when we talk about discrimination it amounts to
infringement of human rights it occurred to United Nations though the
discrimination is defined but it usually depends on case to case, to that the
committee suggested the ‘reasonable and objective’ test for better
understanding
However,
human right is a wider term in comparison to the fundamental right as the human
rights are internationally recognised while these fundamental rights we have
read are limited to the Indian citizen or to a nation.
Works Cited
B.K.Mukherjee.
(n.d.). indiankanoon.org. Retrieved from https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/human-rights-and-anti-discrimination/human-rights-scrutiny/public-sector-guidance-sheets/rights-equality-and-non-discrimination
Das, S. R. (n.d.).
indiankanoon.org. Retrieved from https://indiankanoon.org/doc/149321/#:~:text=On%20June%207%2C%201950%2C%20Srimathi,of%20mandamus%20or%20other%20suitable
government, a.
(n.d.). attorney general's department. Retrieved from https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/human-rights-and-anti-discrimination/human-rights-scrutiny/public-sector-guidance-sheets/rights-equality-and-non-discrimination
IEAG. (n.d.). Inclusive
Education Action Group. Retrieved from ieag: https://ieag.org.nz/voices/human-rights-in-aotearoa-new-zealand/
indiankanoon.
(n.d.). indiankaoon.org. Retrieved from indiankanoon:
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/42184625/
kairali. (n.d.).
Retrieved from Legal Services India:
https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-2754-article-14-and-15-of-the-indian-constitution-eradicate-discrimination-and-bring-equality.html
Karanure, H.
(2022, june 2). manupartra. Retrieved from
https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Article-14-Equality-Before-Law-and-Equality-protection-of-the-law
Kashinath, P.
(2019, 12 23). counter current.org. Retrieved from counter
currents.org:
https://countercurrents.org/2019/12/government-fails-to-establish-the-legality-of-the-citizenship-amendment-act-2019/
law, c. g. (n.d.).
indiankaoon.org. Retrieved from https://indiankanoon.org/doc/367586/
M.P.Sastri.
(n.d.). indiankanoon. Retrieved from
https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Article-14-Equality-Before-Law-and-Equality-protection-of-the-law
M.P.Sastri.
(n.d.). indiankanoon.org. Retrieved from
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1101047/
Shekhar, P. (2020,
october 4). ipleader. Retrieved from blog:
https://blog.ipleaders.in/human-rights-constitution-india/
union, O. j.
(2007, 12 14). European Union Agency for fundamental rights. Retrieved
from FRA: https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/21-non-discrimination
wikipedia. (n.d.).
wikipedia. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashoka_Kumar_Thakur_v._Union_of_India#:~:text=On%2010%20April%202008%2C%20the,not%20to%20be%20included%20in.
work, P. a.
(n.d.). Ministry of Women and Child Development, GOI. Retrieved from
Government of India: https://poshatwork.com/no-discrimination/
Comments
Post a Comment