LOVE JIHAD
Religious Nationalism
and The Transgressive Conspiracy Theory of Love Jihad in India
Written By- Areeka Khan
B.A Philosophy
Sophia College for Women, Mumbai
Edited by- Kashaf Ali
2nd Year LL. B
Career College of Law, Bhopal
“If I were a dictator,
religion and state would be separate. I swear by my religion. I will die for
it. But it is my personal affair. The state has nothing to do with it. The
state would look after your secular welfare, health, communications, foreign relations,
currency, and so on, but not your or my religion. That is everybody's personal
concern!”
―
Mahatma Gandhi
According
to Mark Juergensmeyer, an American sociologist and professor specializing in
Global studies and religious studies, religious nationalism does not imply that
religion is inherently nationalist. It also does not imply that nationalism is
inherently religious. However, we occasionally see some form of fusion between
the two. Sometimes the fusion is accidental and innocent. However, the fusion
can be harsh at times, especially when it is
intended to exclude groups within society that are not members of the dominant
religion.
Religion
and politics colliding and people fusing their national
identity and their religious affiliation together
is not a new phenomenon in India. When the country’s constitution was being
drafted after independence and in the aftermath of the Partition, it was decided that the state would maintain a
principled distance from religion. Although this delicate balance was largely
preserved in the early years following independence, it did not take long for
this blurry line between the state and religion to be crossed.
By
all appearances, India remains a secular and multi-faith democracy. In recent
years, underneath the country's outward tolerance, however, there is an
undercurrent of Hindu nationalism that has successfully mobilized a large
segment of upper-caste urban India and the wealthy into an orbit of
authoritarian and anti-Muslim politics.
Hindu
nationalism, like any other religious nationalism, is a majoritarian
nationalism that connects India with Hindu identity
and portrays religious minorities as the other whose loyalty to India forever
remains questionable. Hindu nationalism is primarily a political movement that
aims to re-establish India's Hindu identity through
cultural purification and although all religious minorities in India face
targeted violence, the Muslim men's increased targeted rhetoric is frequently
framed as the primary threat. They are framed as both an internal and external
threat to the country and being othered to the point where they do
not belong within their own nation. The increased threat of love jihad which
has been politically perceived has aggravated this framework.
Right-wing
forces have systematically cultivated the terminology of love jihad. In India,
the term “love jihad” typically refers to Muslim men using love to trick
unwitting and naive Hindu women into marriage, convert them to Islam, and have
multiple children, thereby increasing the Muslim population of India until the
Muslims dominate. Although the conspiracy appears implausible and lacks
evidence, the systematic dissemination of this concept, primarily by right-wing
Hindu nationalist forces, has led much of the Hindu population to accept this
threat as real.
Islamophobia has
exacerbated divisiveness in an already divided nation. Not only is love jihad
immensely polarising, but it also regards women's bodies as something that
needs to be safeguarded and has fed into the belief that Hindus are
historically marginalized victims at the hands of a minority group that
threatens Hindu demographic supremacy.
Since
its inception, love jihad has also been framed as part of a larger
foreign-national conspiracy against India. Arvind Bhadoria, a cabinet member
from Madhya Pradesh, fervently
believes so. Many news outlets, including Zee News, have aired segments
examining how love jihad is a Pakistani-funded conspiracy that operates through
Indian Islamic organizations such as the Popular Front of India and the Student
Islamic Movement of India. Despite these assertions, official police
investigations into inter-religious marriages have revealed no evidence of a
foreign-funded conspiracy.
Engaging
in such mythmaking, political parties raise concerns and generated fear among
the masses over demographic changes and frame it as a part of a more significant geo-political conflict where the state is required to secure its external
borders and meticulously police its internal territory. For India, this
demographic threat is both internal and external with Muslims
inside and Muslims at the borders. This fear has
aided in the securitization of love jihad.
Right-wing
forces have made it quite clear that Muslims are to be regarded as a threat
to crime, terrorism, and forced marriages. Threats like these have instilled
fear in Hindutva voters and as a result, the electorate attempts to legislate
away their concerns, compromising the rights of Indian Muslims. According
to Jeff Kingston, Director of Asian Studies and Professor of History at Temple
University in Japan, Islamophobia is a thriving industry whipped up by those eager
to achieve political objectives and "saffronize" history, heritage,
education, and identity. In the name of a purified Hindu homeland, where
non-Hindus are the enemy to be reconverted or eliminated, the sorrows of
inequality, poverty, and caste provide willing foot soldiers who are eager to
resort to violence.
Several
states in India have, in response to love jihad, enacted a
number of anti-love jihad laws to prevent Muslim men from coercing Hindu
women into inter-religious marriages and conversion. Uttar Pradesh became the
first state in the country to pass such a law in November 2020. Also known
as the Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, it
forbids “unlawful conversion” by means of force, deception, or marriage. The
legislation does not explicitly forbid Hindu women and Muslim men from getting
married. Right-wing vigilante organizations, however, openly collaborate with
the police to disrupt interfaith marriages, using the law as a state-sanctioned
tool to undermine India's secular constitution, infantilize women and detain
innocent Muslim men.
It is undeniable that
the Hindu nationalist vision of Indian democracy differs significantly from its
secular counterpart. It starts with the idea that secular nationalism is a sham
and nothing, but a foreign imposition inflicted by elites associated with the
Indian National Congress during the independence, obscuring
India’s true Hindu identity. For them, Hinduism is the ultimate source of the
country's identity, and this identity is under threat by love jihad.
Religion
has become the main source of bigotry, prejudice, and bloodshed due to the
merging of Indian politics with it. This marriage between religion and
politics, in my opinion, should be considered unconstitutional and not an
interfaith marriage between two consenting adults. Trampling
on the founding principles of the country with
religious nationalism, the leaders of our country
fail to realize that without secularism, freedom, and equality, India has
started to lose its meaning as the largest democracy in
the world.
References:
·
· https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.elsevier-33fac876-1b22-3d3a-a006-0b5a1f5f893c
·
· https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0976399619825691
· https://muse.jhu.edu/article/447095/summary
· https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/12/1074/htm#B5-religions-12-01074
· https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/crer/research/publications/research_papers/rp_no.23.pdf
· https://www.cfr.org/event/religious-nationalism-around-world
· https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325539000_Religion_and_Nationalism_in_Southeast_Asia
·
https://carnegieendowment.org/files/BJP_In_Power_final.pdf
· https://newlinesmag.com/reportage/the-love-jihad-conspiracy-theory/
·
https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/easa2018/paper/42609
·
https://academic.oup.com/book/1690/chapter-abstract/141259110?redirectedFrom=fulltext
·
https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/quotes/mohandas-gandhi-on-communal-harmony
Comments
Post a Comment