AFFIRMATIVE ACTIONS
AFFIRMATIVE
ACTIONS
WRITTEN
BY: M.TEJASWI
4TH
YEAR, B.A. LL.B
GITAM
SCHOOL OF LAW, ANDRA PRADESH.
EDITED
BY: KASHAF ALI
3RD
YEAR, LL.B
CAREER
COLLEGE OF LAW, BHOPAL (M.P)
Abstract
“Affirmative actions are policies and practices
promoting equal opportunities for marginalized groups. In this record, I will explore the historical context, legal framework,
benefits, and critiques of affirmative actions”.
This abstract aims to give a neutral opinion on affirmative
action, acknowledge its possibility in progressive
social justice and diversity and the legitimate concerns raised by its critics.
In direct the complexities of this policy, it is essential to consider the
broader societal context and the specific goals and effective methods employed to promote equity and inclusion.
Affirmative action is a policy approach
that addresses humanistic discipline and ongoing equivalence, favouritism, and under-representation faced by peripheral groups in various
aspects of society, particularly in business and educational activity. This
concept provides a compact summary of affirmative action, its objectives,
controversies, and potential benefits.
Keywords: Affirmative
action, equity, inclusive, diversity, discrimination, under-representation, social justice, meritocracy,
controversial policy
Introduction:
Affirmative
actions are also considered as the reservation system, which has pros and cons.
The past historical events that we lighten are based on race, caste, religion,
gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status.
Affirmative
actions are legal and agreed upon and accepted by the Constitution and the acts to
protect and preserve unity in diversity.
The unity in diversity is the umbrella. Many
castes, cultures, traditions, food systems, languages, livelihoods, and
habitats are different according to geographical location; people's livelihoods
and earnings change.
The
people who do not have access to education and employment are more,
which affects the country at large because employment and education are more
important as well as the rights of the citizens of the country. Affirmative
action deals with the above concept, and the use of affirmative action and how
it protects people are crucial as well as those that are considered human
rights.
Historical
Context and Background
Affirmative actions are not
started in one country/state, but in other countries too. The civil movement of
the mid-20th century, where the activists revolt for the rights for the
marginalized groups, where the elimination of the discrimination in the life of
the people.
The eradication of the evils
like inequalities and providing legal protection to the people for standard
livelihood and protect and preserve the human values is the main concept.
There is not rich and poor the
usage of mind matters, but this is like a myth these days because the recognition of the ideology is poor
that’s why the affirmative actions are more active and more actions are taken by
the government to protect and recognize the human rights from past, the value
to human rights and Constitution is the basic criteria.
Provisions
applied:
India faced many problems, but the Indian
Constitution gives provisions that are also called positive discrimination.
Positive discrimination is not considered as discrimination; it talks about
equity among equity and equals among equals to lift the marginal society
because India is filled with economically weaker to provide the base to resolve
the problem. The provisions are:
Preamble: sovereign, socialist, secular,
democratic, republic, justice, liberty, equality, fraternity, integrity.
Article 14 to 32 of the Indian
Constitution applies which talks about fundamental rights.
Right
to equality
Right
to freedom, right against exploitation
Right
to freedom of religion
Cultural
and educational rights
Right
to constitutional remedies.
Purpose
and Objectives of Affirmative Actions
·
Promoting
Equal/fair possibilities
Affirmative action is more important to give a chance to everyone irrespective of their background and preserve the value of human rights, protect historically disadvantaged groups.
·
Creating
Diverse and Inclusive Environments:
Raising diversity, create benefits from different appearances and experiences, socialization creation, and creative thinking.
·
Rectifying
Past Injustices:
Affirmative actions purpose to code the past/historical problems faced by
marginalized communities due to past events in history on discrimination and exclusionary practices.
Legal
Framework and Regulations
ü
Executive
Orders
Head of state guidance, such as Executive
Order 11246, has authorization on affirmative
actions for the
permanent contractors and
subcontractors to promote equal employment possibility.
ü
Affirmative
Action Plans
Organizations develop affirmative action
plans by
drafting their standing orders and practices to upgrade equal chances
and diversity in their profession or student body.
ü Supreme Court Rulings
The landmark case on the affirmative action “ University of California
vs. Bakke, the supreme court given guidelines on limits of the affirmative
actions and legal validity.
Benefits
and Outcomes of Affirmative Actions
v
Increased
Representation
Affirmative actions have led to greater
cooperation of
(who are fall under) below poverty line groups in literature,
workplaces, and leadership positions, authorize
individuals and run off stereotypes.
v
Enhanced
Diversity
By promoting diversity, management
benefits from a wider range of appearances, improving decisions, and
encouraging conception.
v
Reduced
Inequalities
Affirmative actions work like a bridge and clear
the gaps in opportunity
to get education, professional, and socioeconomic opportunities,
leading to a free
&fair, and more equitable
social group.
Affirmative action in India, also referred to as reservation, is a policy enforced by the authorities to address historical and social rights deprivation faced by certain groups. It aims to provide equal chances
and representation to historically meagre communities, “primarily Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes
(ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs)."
Here
are some key aspects of affirmative action in India:
1.
Constitutional
Provisions:
Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Indian Constitution shed light on affirmative action in the form of reservations. The
Constitution allows reservations in educational institutions and public
employment for marginalized
people like scheduled tribes, scheduled castes, and socially and educationally backward classes.
2.
Reservation
in Education:
Both at the central and state levels, Educational institutions reserve a specific percentage of seats for SCs, STs, and
OBCs. This includes education schools, colleges,
and universities. The specific percentage of
reservations differs from state to state and can be as high as
50%.
3.
Reservation
in Employment:
Public services,
both at the central and state levels, have been allotted to
SCs, ST’s,
and OBC’s. The percentage of reservation in public jobs and allotment differs from state to state and can be extended to 50%.
4.
Mandal
Commission:
It is officially known as the Second Backward Classes
Commission, recommended allotment for OBC’s in central public services. This led to the carrying out of OBC reservations in
the 27% concept.
5.
Creamy
Layer:
To ensure that the benefits of reserve
reach the most deprived
sections within the OBC’s, a "creamy layer" concept came into limelight. It excludes individuals from well-off
OBC families from getting reservation benefits.
6.
Legal
Cases and Controversies:
Affirmative action in India has been the
theme of many legal objection and contention. Numerous individuals and groups
have filed suit in courts, both in for and against reservation system.
The Indian Supreme
Court has issued respective rulings over the decades,
maintaining the constitutionality of the reservation system while also distinguishing certain
limitations.
7.
Reservation
in Politics:
Some states in India have also enforced
reservations for SCs, STs, and OBCs in Panchayat and Municipalities, which come under local
government to ensure their
political representation.
It's important to record that affirmative action in India is a rigid and dynamic topic. The
particular policies, their enforcement, and legal cases can differ from state
to state. Moreover, debates encompassing on
reservations often touch on matters of social
justice, equality, and meritocracy.
Critiques
and Controversies Surrounding Affirmative Actions
Disagreement on Fairness
Disagreed parties debate that affirmative actions can be
reverse discrimination, as they provide advantageous treatment based on race or
gender.
Challenges Of Implementation
Critics point out that enforcing
affirmative actions can be provocative, as the policies need to onset a
proportion between rectifying past injustice and supporting meritocracy.
Tokenism and Lack Of Authentic Inclusion
Some contend that affirmative actions can
trail to tokenism, where individuals from not identified communities may be included glib without addressing
underlying systemic facts.
Conclusion
and Future Considerations
Affirmative actions have played an
essential role in ambitious systemic inequities and promoting diversity.
However, ongoing talks are essential to fine-tune these policies, ensuring free, fair, and comprehensive practices. Continued efforts
to address diversity and inclusion will be vital in creating a more equitable
society for all.
The affirmative actions are considered as positive discrimination and also
falls under human rights of individuals.
Bibliography:
Book:
1.
M.Laxmikanth,
Indian Polity, 5th edition (2011), pg.no. 7.3
2.
Ibid,
pg.no.4.1
Article:
3.
Will
Kenton, What Is
Affirmative Action? How It Works and Example, Michela Buttignol,
July 16, 2023,
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/affirmative-action.asp#:~:text=Affirmative%20action%20refers%20to%20a,in%20leadership%20and%20professional%20roles.
4. Munusamy & Kiruba (2022), The legal
basis for affirmative action in India, WIDER Working Paper, No. 2022/74, ISBN
978-92-9267-205-8, The United Nations University World Institute for
Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki,
https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/2022/205-8,
Comments
Post a Comment